
The Federal Trade Commission released a report on the marketing of food to kids. Apparently, food companies spent $1.6 billion to market their products to children and teenagers in 2006. And the verdict of the report: there is no instance where marketing food to kids need to be regulated.
And their recommendation? They urged other food companies to join the industry’s VOLUNTARY and SELF-REGULATED group called Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, established by the Council of Better Business Bureaus in November 2006. There are 14 food giants as members including, Coca-cola, Kellogg, Cadbury Adams and PepsiCo.
Let’s step back a moment. The FTC conducted this report to study the rising obesity rates in the US. I recognize the complexity of the obesity issue and know that it is not the simply the fault of 14 companies and their advertising. But these companies, and their food, are certainly playing a role in the expanding wastelines of US residents.
So far, the food giants have pledged to either stop aiming ads at children or to promote only what the council calls better-for-you products. Sounds reasonable, right? Except there is no definition as to what “better for you” means.
In the Better Business Bureau program, the companies themselves determine what is better food, the companies themselves determine what is children’s advertising. The companies determine all these things; there’s not even a real uniformity in what these decisions are.
Said Robert Kesten, the executive director of the Center for Screen-Time Awareness, a Washington-based group that aims to limit media influence.
The food giants are taking steps. The New York Times reports that the Campbell Soup Company, no longer advertises Chicken Noodle Soup on its Web sites that are targeted to children. And a spokeswomen for Cadbury Adams says they have has stopped marketing Bubblicious gum to children. Kellogg’s has also “reformulated” products like Apple Jacks, Froot Loops and Corn Pops, so that they meet the company’s declared nutrition requirements for children. (Although last I checked the cereals still contained high fructose corn syrup)
It’s the marketing industry policing itself, and as is shown over and over and over again, that’s problematic, said Susan Linn, director of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood.
What do you think?
takepart and find wholesome, fresh sustainable food in the US and Canada.
Related:
Trans Fat Films: Top 10 Films Featuring Fast Food
LA Bands New Fast Food Joints in South Los Angeles
Tug of War in Food Marketing to Children
FTC Backs Self-Regulation
Join TakePart's community today!
Filed under:
Environment • Global Health
Related Links:
King Corn Documentary Shows What The Shuck The Corn Industry Is Up To
L.A. Bans New Fast Food Joints in South Los Angeles
Mississipi’s Proposal To Stop Restaurants From Serving Obese People
Cadbury Strikes Sweet Deal With Cocoa Farmers
Sweet Deception: High Fructose Corn Syrup Ads Hit the Airwaves
Tagged as:Apple Jacks • Better Business Bureau • Campbell Soup Company • Children's Nutrition • childrens food and beverage advertising initiative • Corn Pops • Council of Better Business Bureaus • Federal Trade Commission • Food and Drug Administration • food industry • FTC • government and foods • hungry for change • nutritional info • U.S. government and food
Add your comment • Trackback from your site • Follow comments via
RSS
17 posts in the last 24 hours

I think that “better for you” foods can be regulated by the companies themselves. If they have high fructose corn syrup - it’s on the box, what more can the companies do? The government should not spend the time nor money on regulation when it really should be parental regulation or self-regulation. The companies are doing their part.
Alexis