No Gravatar

Is fake grass better than real grass for the environment? Eco-conscious homeowners with manicured lawns may well wonder if putting down the artificial stuff is the preferable choice for the environment than tending to the real thing. Synthetic grass requires less maintenance, which means less chemicals and less pollution from gas-powered mowers. But manufacturing the plastic grass creates CO2 as well. So which is greener?

Brendan Koerner, an eco-columnist for Slate.org says it depends on your lawn-care regimen, and also your geographic location. If you’re careless with fertilizer, heedlessly mow your lawn, or are trying to create a golf-course worth yard in the middle of the desert, fake grass might be the better bet.

There are several drawbacks to the real thing. First, they drink up a lot of water – 21,600 gallons per year on average. Second, one hour of mowing creates the same amount of pollution as driving a car 93 miles in a car. American homeowners use approximately 3 million metric tons of synthetic lawn fertilizer per year, which requires 11.8 million barrels of oil to create annually. Americans also use around 70 million pounds of pesticides and herbicides on their lawns every year.

On the plus side, real grass acts as a carbon offset. According to a 2005 NASA study, American lawns can absorb approximately 13.2 million pounds of CO2 per year. Still, the study also concurred that this carbon offsetting really just makes up for the CO2 created in producing the fertilizers and powering the mowers.

Fake grass doesn’t require watering or fertilizing, but the production of polyethylene, polymers and elastomeric coatings are energy intensive. And like most plastics, when its lifespan has expired, it ends up in the landfill. Canada’s Athena Institute calculated the carbon-producing effects of converting one school field from real to fake grass, and concluded that they would have to plant and maintain 1,861 trees for 10 years in order to make the field carbon neutral. Additionally, environmental activists claim that the rubber infill in certain types of fake grass can cause health problems if inhaled.

Slate’s advice? If you want to forego the watering and mowing, choose a quality product that will last 10 years or more. If you prefer the real thing, rethink your lawn care practices. Compost your clippings, replace your gas mower with a reel push model, and switch to organic fertilizers. at Eartheasy.com and learn more about natural lawn care, and reducing the impact of your green yard on your green living.

Related:

>>Greg Cooper’s plastic grass doesn’t need mowing, water or chemicals. What it needs is city approval

>>First, Fake Fake Grass. Now, Real Fake Grass

>>Turf War Brews Over Fake or Real Grass

Join TakePart's community today!

Comments


3 Responses to “Is Fake Grass Better Than Real Grass for the Environment?”

  1. Weeds are actually best for the environment. Many are used for medicines and they are all fast growing carbon breathers!
    Most kids prefer dandelions for a reason.

    Chaos and Creation In My Own Back Yard
    Inspired by Sir Paul McCartney
    For my neighbours

    While I was away, in a foreign land,
    My green lawn grass died; weeds took a stand.
    They didn’t need water. They grew from the dew.
    Changing carbon to oxygen, for me and for you.
    Instead of man’s grass, which requires much noise,
    Nature’s plants grew, without poison or toys.
    Dandelion, chamomile, milk thistle, clover,
    Ground covers and trees were growing all over.
    Many of these plants were sought after and used,
    To help us stay healthy. Is nature being misused?
    Bad business is rampant. Why try to take down,
    Our natural medicine, that many renown?
    Lets all stop lawn maintenance pollution!
    Be NOT of the problem. Be OF the solution!

    Lora Bruncke

  2. Golf Course Pesticides

    I enjoyed reading your blog. It is so interesting reading other peoples personal take on a subject.

  3. golf course pesticides

    This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to, or referring to their articles. One notable blogging tool that does not support

Add your comments