
Christmas is a pretty important time for a lot of folks : for Christians it is the day their savior was born, for many, it is one of, if not the only time that they will be able to visit their family, for retailers it’s the time of year that they are expected to pull in the majority of their profits and for the movie studios it marks the last few days they have to get potential award winners into the theaters along with a chance to release more family friendly fare:
Family-friendly films saw a spike the day after Christmas as kids and parents looked for something to do, while Paramount Vantage scored one of the best recent per-location averages with the bow of “There Will Be Blood” in two theaters in New York and Los Angeles.“Blood,” directed by Paul Thomas Anderson and starring Daniel Day Lewis, grossed an estimated $67,951 in its bow, according to Rentrak, for a per-location average of $33,976. Film is among the last three specialty titles to unspool before the year ends.The domestic box office remains ahead of 2006 by 5%, according to Nielsen EDI. That’s a relief for studios, who saw the box office take a surprise stumble this fall after a record-breaking summer. The holiday sesh thus far has rallied the B.O. back to good health, posting some of the best numbers on record for an extended holiday frame. [Variety]
For this brings up an especially frustrating thing - ever since I moved to New York, each Christmas has meant that the one movie I want to see more than any other and have likely been waiting all year to see, opens on Christmas day or the day after - the catch is that it always opens only in New York and LA, and I spend Christmas in Ohio with my family.

This year that film is Paul Thomas Andersen’s There Will Be Blood. So while all my friends in NYC got to go on opening day to see what promises to be an amazing film, (something happening less and less these days where American film is concerned) I got to go see Charlie Wilson’s War. This isn’t to put Charlie down, it’s a really good film that everyone should see, if only for Philip Seymour Hoffman’s outstanding performance and the last title card at the very end of the movie, that has a quote that is more relevant to our political situation than anything I have seen in some time. (Also Tom Hanks steps up his game here, giving a performance reminiscent of the days when every movie he made turned to gold - everything before the extremely over-rated Saving Private Ryan).But back to the point - I should have had the option to see There Will Be Blood! For a while now I have been wondering why there is no longer a fervor among young folks for the cinema, for good cinema, for political cinema, for the cinema that could and should define us. And more and more I am realizing that the studios formula for box office success, for taking a movie like There Will Be Blood and making it as profitable as possible, is really representative of the state of cinema today.Paul Thomas Andersen (the director of TWBB) is in many ways the closest thing we have to an American auteur and he hasn’t made a film since 2002 - this should be more than enough to get people flocking to the theater. But in today’s blockbuster climate, the studio has to release the film in stages, it has to in a sense fool people into going to the theater.This makes me sad…So as not to feel completely hopeless, I am going to leave you with a link to learn more about The Cleveland Film Society - cinephiles are everywhere, even in Ohio, and maybe we just need a little help finding each other to fight the good fight.Go here for more info on the Cleveland Film Society.And because I am still angry, watch the trailer for There Will Be Blood below and think about heading out to see it when it opens in your town, and also, watch the trailer for Charlie Wilson’s War, a good choice if you don’t live in NY or LA: